Don't look at me..
Originally uploaded by john edward.

Photographing “Beautiful”

Beauty as they say is in the eye of the beholder. That saying is incredibly evident in world of photography. You can have a situation where there are 5 photographers shooting the same subject under the same lighting conditions from the same exact vantage point but you end up with very different results. Different not really on what it is you see inside the picture but how the image was captured. I can be technical about it but that isn’t what this article is about- I’m still figuring it out. Instead, I want to point out that each person’s work is unique in the way it captures a viewer’s emotions, tastes and even imagination. It’s not quite tangible but still evident. The feeling an image evokes in a viewer is what gives it character and identity. Most of the time this reveals a pattern often regarded as a photographer’s style or trademark.

As a photographer I have my own definition of what is beautiful. I would personally go for something fresh, emotionally charged and extremely appealing …again that’s subjective! When I see it my frame (that’s my camera's viewfinder) I know. People around me would know too because I’d normally shake my head in disbelief and sometimes blurt out: “beautiful! Or Ang ganda!” My interpretation of beauty however can be taken to the extreme thus narrowing my audience to more artistic (contemporary and edgy) tastes. Keeping in mind the objective of the shoot and/ or what the subject wants to see puts my artistic tendencies at bay. This often gains the approval of a wider, more traditional audience.

All that said, photographing "beautiful" is increasingly becoming more challenging since my standard of what's beautiful just keeps going up a notch after each shoot. Fresh imagery too age and spoil after time. So each time I go out there, it's a quest to once again photograph "beautiful."